CDT: A Cross-Dimensional Terminology Method for Precise AI Prompt Engineering
CDT: A Cross-Dimensional Terminology Method for Precise AI Prompt Engineering
A systematic approach to defining AI prompts through cross-cultural, cross-temporal, and cross-domain validation
TL;DR
CDT (Cross-Dimensional Terminology) is a methodology for defining precise AI prompts by validating concepts across three dimensions: culture, time, and domain. When a concept has corresponding terms in both Eastern and Western philosophical traditions, it proves the concept is not arbitrary but has been deeply abstracted and historically validated.
The Problem: When AI Misunderstands Your Intent
Have you ever spent 30 minutes crafting an AI prompt, only to get results completely different from what you expected? This common frustration happens because:
- You have a clear concept in mind but can't find the precise terminology
- Vague words lead to AI misinterpretation
- You spend excessive time revising prompts
- Final results still diverge significantly from expectations
The root cause: We lack a systematic method to define and communicate abstract concepts to AI.
The Solution: Learning from Philosophical Traditions
Here's a key insight: When a concept has precise corresponding terms in both Eastern and Western philosophical traditions, it proves the concept captures fundamental patterns of human cognition that transcend cultural limitations.
Examples of Cross-Cultural Validation
| Concept | Western Origin | Eastern Origin |
|---|---|---|
| Abstraction | Latin "abstractio" (to draw away) | Chinese "理" (li - inner principle) |
| Analysis | Greek "analysis" (to break apart) | Chinese "析" (xi - to divide and examine) |
This cross-cultural correspondence tells us these concepts are universally understood across human civilization.
The Three-Dimensional Validation Framework
1. Cross-Cultural Validation
Verify whether a concept transcends specific cultural contexts:
- Western tradition (typically from Greco-Latin origins)
- Eastern tradition (typically from Chinese classical philosophy)
2. Cross-Temporal Validation
Examine a concept's evolution and stability through history:
- Ancient original expressions
- Medieval development and evolution
- Modern precise correspondences
3. Cross-Domain Validation
Test whether a concept maintains consistent core meaning across different fields:
- Philosophical original definition
- Scientific professional application
- Technical concrete implementation
How to Apply CDT: Step-by-Step Process
- Identify Core Concepts: Determine key concepts that need precise expression in your prompt
- Perform Cross-Cultural Term Matching: Find expressions in both Eastern and Western philosophical traditions
- Extract Essential Features: Analyze common core characteristics across cultural terms
- Find Modern Precise Correspondences: Based on extracted features, find precise modern language equivalents
- Transform into Domain Terminology: Combine domain features with modern terminology
- Apply in Prompts: Integrate precise terminology into your prompts
Practical Example: From Vague to Precise
Before CDT (Vague Prompt)
"I need AI to help me write code that looks nice, clean, using some common organizational methods..."
After CDT (Precise Prompt)
"I need AI to help me write high-quality code meeting these professional standards:
- Apply appropriate software architecture patterns (e.g., MVC, layered architecture)
- Follow code readability principles with consistent naming conventions
- Maintain low coupling and high cohesion principles
- Apply appropriate GoF design patterns for common programming problems"
Terminology Definition Micro-Format
To ensure AI accurately understands your defined terms, use this structured format:
Term: [term name]
Definition: [concise definition]
Features: [core characteristics, comma-separated]
Opposite: [contrasting concept]
Example: [brief example]
Example Application
Term: Systems Thinking
Definition: A way of thinking that analyzes interrelationships between elements and their collective effects
Features: Holistic, Relational, Dynamic, Networked
Opposite: Reductionist thinking (focusing only on isolated components)
Example: Understanding climate change requires considering complex interactions of multiple factors
Key Benefits of CDT
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Universality | Concepts validated across cultures are more universally understood |
| Precision | Eliminates ambiguity and vagueness in terminology |
| Structure | Provides systematic terminology definition method |
| AI Comprehension | Dramatically improves AI's accuracy in understanding prompts |
Conclusion
CDT transforms how we communicate with AI by grounding our terminology in concepts that have been validated across human civilization. When we master this method, we can express abstract concepts more naturally in the AI era, enabling machines to truly understand the essence of human thought.
About the Author
Deepractice - Making AI at Your Fingertips
- Website: https://deepractice.ai
- GitHub: https://github.com/Deepractice
- Contact: sean@deepractice.ai